Note from Con Slobodchikoff: This is a post by guest author Nancy Frensley, CPDT, CAP2, who is Manager of Behavior and Training at the Berkeley-East Bay Humane Society in Berkeley, California. She
will write periodic posts about the behavioral challenges and joys of shelter
dogs.
Among the most fascinating and troubling phenomena I’ve
observed while working in shelters and performing temperament testing are the
difference in test responses between dogs found in shelters and dogs
surrendered directly by their owners. Overall, more dogs already residing in
shelters pass temperament testing and are more likely to be placed up for
adoption than those brought in by owners. I have seen this hold true for over
twenty years.
The most common items that owner-surrendered dogs do not
pass are guarding of food, objects and space, and also, being handled by
strangers. It’s amazing that you do not see as much of this in dogs who have
been in shelters – even for a few days. Many of these have been picked up as
strays or have simply been back yard dogs without any family experience at all.
During routine temperament screening for adoptability, evaluators
attempt to identify dogs that will be safe when placed in a home as a companion
animal. They also look for aspects of the dog’s personality that will make him
a pleasant, affiliative pet, and fun for an owner or family to interact with.
They also want to find out enough about the dog to match him successfully with
a family or individual.
The tests are not designed to push a dog over the edge. Or,
to assess how much stress he can handle. They are solely based on typical types
of interactions a dog might experience on a normal day within the home.
A very problematic part of the tests for dogs who arrive
with owners involve stroking and touching different parts of the body
(including ears, eyes, paws and muzzle) to see how they tolerate being handled.
A side benefit of this is it gives the evaluators an opportunity to screen the
dog’s body condition for any health issues he might have, such as being under
or overweight or having signs of a common illness. A surprising number of dogs
have dental problems and are in need of medical attention for this alone. Dental work can be anything from a dental
cleaning to tooth extractions. And, it is not uncommon for dogs to be
surrendered for re-homing because the owner cannot afford the vet bills.
Other tests include those that measure a dog’s tendency to
guard food or objects. Dogs with guarding issues are frequently unsafe to live
with as pets. While guarding behaviors can certainly be worked with and
modified, it is not a good idea to place a dog that is known to have this problem
in a new companion home.
In today’s economy, more people seem to be forced to give up
loved pets to shelters for re-homing. It is a heart-wrenching decision, but one
that must be made under many circumstances.
Whatever the reason, I have never seen this to be easy for anyone.
When someone arrives at a shelter with a dog they must
surrender, the dog is temperament tested and screened for health issues without
the owner present. This is where I see a lot of differences between un-owned
and owned dogs. The owned ones are
usually dogs that have been treated as pets and lived (for the most part)
successfully with people for a number of years. Amazingly enough, a large
number of these dogs growl or snap at simple, gentle stroking or just upon
making eye contact with a person. An extraordinarily large number of them guard
a bowl of food or an item such as a bone or chew stick.
The owners typically have never experienced any of this with
their dogs, but here are a couple of things that might be going wrong: 1.) The
dog finds himself in a situation that reminds him of the veterinarian’s office
and/or 2.) The dog feels the tension and sadness in his owner. This might
explain why he suddenly feels intimidated or frightened by simple eye contact
or being touched by a stranger. However, it does not explain guarding.
Possessiveness of food and other items is closely tied to a dog’s survival
traits and is more than likely a fixed pattern of behavior. The fact it did not
appear in the home setting could be a result of gradual habituation and the
build up of trust in his owner and the living environment. In the new
situation, it surfaces and as a result the dog becomes difficult to place into
a new home.
These experiences make it incumbent upon me to stress the
importance of full and complete socialization of any companion dog from the
first day he arrives at your home. From my experience in teaching puppy classes
to that of working with difficult and aggressive dogs, nothing jumps out as
being more important than giving a dog the ability to trust people in all
situations. And it is, truly, we who have the unique ability to create trust in
our dogs. They cannot do it on their own. As dog owners, we own the obligation
to help our dogs trust others beside ourselves, so if needed they can make it
through the difficult times in their lives as well as ours.
To:Susan Kuchinkas on Behavior Problems in Dogs that Need Re-homing.
Thank you for your insight into this situation. Puppies that are turned into shelters
frequently lack any kind of normal inter-dog pack activity. In a normal situation, the puppy would be with his mother and siblings for at least eight weeks and maybe more. The pup would learn a lot from them-appropriate social interaction, bite inhibition, etc. In a good home, the puppy would also be exposed to a variety of people and have positive experiences with them as well. The separation experience would, ideally, be gradual enough to help the puppy develop coping mechanisms. Puppies should have these experiences during their best social acquisition period, which is prior to 16 weeks.
Found or abandoned puppies rarely have any of these advantages and experience, as in your puppy's case, relocation during early developmental stages. These stages can include periods of intense fear. In his case, an early adoption could have helped him develop confidence, especially if the adopter exposed him to appropriate adult dogs so he could learn to be "doggy".
It's really great that you have taken on this task and are building his confidence. It would be helpful for you to train him to do a down stay on a lightweight mat that you can carry with you. That way he will always have something familiar to lie on and something familiar to do in new situations. This should, of course, be taught with positive reinforcement; praise and treats. Dog sports, such as agility, flyball and tracking are also good confidence builders for shy dogs and fun for you, too.
Thanks so much for your comments.
Posted by: Nancy Frensley, CAP2, CPDT | May 11, 2009 at 04:49 PM
As the co-companion to a rescue dog, let me add a third possibility to the discussion.
We adopted our dog at 14 weeks old from an org that takes dogs from shelters, fosters and rehomes. At 14 weeks, he had already been in 3 or possibly 4 living situations, had been to the vet three times -- and had had painful neutering surgery.
He behaved like a normal pup when we met him at his last foster home, but he became terrified when I carried him out the door. He remained terrified for a couple of weeks, and it took a month for him to begin to bond with us.
He is now a wonderful and lovely dog when he's alone with us in our home, and he has about 10 human "friends" he's always happy to see. But he remains very fearful of new things, and even gets anxious when we put a box or something new in the kitchen.
We recently had a big breakthrough: We hosted a neighborhood meeting at my house, with about 20 people. I kept him at my side on a leash and he stayed quiet and even relaxed enough to lie down a couple of times. This is after two years. I expect continued improvement and hope that someday he will not fear change
If, heaven forbid, he ended up in a shelter (yes, he is chipped and licensed), he would be a shivering wreck and totally unadoptable.
I believe that the current practice of not letting dogs be adopted until 14 weeks is very harmful to them. Without having a secure pack or person to bond with, their brains develop with a hyper-reactivity to fear that's very difficult to mend.
Posted by: Susan Kuchinskas | May 11, 2009 at 11:47 AM
Rick,
Thank you for your very thoughtful comments on my post. I think you have really hit on something by relating pack or family structure to this problem.
Studies of village and other primitive dogs by Coppinger and Serpell certainly support your theory that dogs that have had to cope on their own are much more flexible, opportunistic and open to new experiences than dogs raised in more insulated surroundings such as homes. If the proof is in the pudding-you are right on target. We experience this all the time.
Dogs that have lived in a home (a structured environment in which everything and everybody is stable) are much more likely to become fearful and defensive when they are confused by change. Dogs are, also, emotionally connected to us. They do sense and respond to their owner’s tension in these situations.
All behavior is affected by a dog’s individual attributes and some dogs are more socially resilient than others. We do see surrendered dogs that are well socialized and do very well in the shelter environment. It’s just that they seem to be in the minority, at least in this area.
Protecting a food source, however, is believed by experts in the field to be a more vestigial than learned behavior and it stands alone from other types of aggression. It would be difficult for a dog to instantly learn to guard food if the tendency to do so were not already there. When we see this behavior appear in food tests and question the owners further, we often find that there have been little signs of it off and on prior to the dog coming to the shelter. An interesting thought on this comes from Jean Donaldson, PhD and well known dog behavior expert. She says that it is incredible that food guarding still appears in a species that, for centuries, has not had to hunt to obtain food nor protect it from others.
I really appreciate the way in which you have clearly explained this. It helped me clarify my thoughts on the subject. It certainly makes a case for everyone making a lifetime training plan for their dogs that includes extensive socialization with both the familiar and unfamiliar.
Nancy Frensley CPDT, CAP2
Posted by: Nancy Frensley, CAP2, CPDT | April 23, 2009 at 03:58 PM
how about some thoughts on this for a possible explanation ? - for those of you who subscribe to the general pack theory. a dog rejected suddenly from the family "pack" suddenly has no clue how to react and survive on its own and quickly becomes a food hoarder, is more reactive to anyone approaching or touching it, and in general is confused, fearful and therefore easily provoked into fear aggression. a dog who has had to cope on its own, whether on the streets, or in the company of kind shelter personnel, is now much more eager and willing to do whatever it takes to join a new pack, which is manifested in much more submissive, sociable and agreeable patterns of behavior. Obviously there will be a wide variety of background issues that will affect both types of dogs differently, but the pack theory example seems to be a reasonable explanation to my simple mind :-) one way to test this might be to add this survey question to the family member who dumps their dog at a shelter: 1. did you ever have to leave the dog with another family for any period of time, and if so, how did the dog react while separated ? If the answer is yes, and the dog was fine, it would seem to support my theory. regarding the possibility the relinquished dog associated the shelter with a vet office : if it wasn't properly socialized for vet visits, and really did make the association and thought it might now have to LIVE at the vet office, it's not hard to see why it acted that way :-) i once had a pom that lived 17 years. an angel to anyone who came to our house, and there were many of all ages, since my house is also our ballet studio. strangers and students were treated alike. i took her out all over town, and everyone who approached her loved her, but that sweet angel would snap snarl and growl at anyone that came close when she was alone outside the house. i raised her from a pup - NO guarding issues ever, and very obedient. i could put her in a sit and go inside and order coffee, but if i gave her a toy in that situation and anyone tried to approach her she would quickly pick it up and growl deeply. i doubt she would have been easy to re-home either, and fortunately she never had to be....
Posted by: rick smith | April 22, 2009 at 01:28 PM