Are dog barks just meaningless sounds designed to get attention? Or do the barks contain information that other dogs can use about the context of the bark or the identity of the caller?
Two articles have been published recently that address this controversy. One article says that barking contains no information, but is a way of dogs grabbing attention for the purpose of mobbing, a cooperative behavior that is used by a variety of animals to repel potential predators (Lord et al. 2009. Barking and mobbing. Behavioural Processes 81:358 -- 368). The other article says that dogs can incorporate information about the context of the bark and the identity of the individual dog who is barking (Molnar et al. 2009. Dogs discriminate between barks: The effect of context and identity of the caller. Behavioral Processes 82:198 -- 201).
The article by Lord et al. presents a lot of the acoustic characteristics of dog barks and says that these acoustic characteristics are similar to the kinds of signals produced by birds and other mammals when they are mobbing a predator. Typically these calls have a raspy sound to them, have a lot of noise, and generally sound very harsh to our ears. On the basis of this kind of similarity, the authors suggest that there is no meaning incorporated into the calls. This follows the theories of Raymond Coppinger (one of the authors of the Lord et al. article), who has argued that dog barks have no meaning beyond conveying excitement or general arousal.
The article by Molnar et al. approaches this problem by doing experiments. The authors collected barks from five Mudi dogs, Hungarian sheepdogs. The barks occurred in two behavioral contexts: when the dogs were barking for a stranger, and when the dogs were barking because they were left alone. Then they used another group of 30 dogs in a technique called habituation -- dishabituation. In this technique a dog is played back a sequence of three barks for the same context, and then played back a bark for a different context. The experimenters assess how much time the dog spends looking at the speaker for each of the playbacks of the barks. If the dog cannot detect any difference between the sequence of the first three barks and the last bark, the dog should spend a shorter and shorter amount of time looking at the speaker after each playback, by habituating to the barks. If on the other hand the dog can recognize the difference between the first three playbacks and the last one, where the last one is a bark from a different context, then the dog would spend more time looking at the speaker after the fourth playback than it did looking at the speaker after the third playback.
This is exactly what the authors of the study found. Also, when they played back a sequence of barks recorded from the same individual dog, and then a bark from a different individual dog in the same context, the dogs listened more to the bark of the different dog, suggesting that they can tell the differences between barks from different dogs for the same context.
The Molnar et al. study follows up on an earlier study by Yin and McCowan in 2004 where those authors analyzed the acoustic structure of dog barks in three different contexts: a stranger ringing a doorbell, a dog who is isolated from her owner, and a play situation where two dogs were a dog and human are playing together. The statistical analysis of the acoustic structure of the different calls showed that the calls could be grouped into different contexts, and also that the calls from individual dogs could be identified (Yin, S. and B. McCowan. 2004. Barking in domestic dogs: context specificity and individual identification. Animal Behaviour 68: 343-355).
The two studies, Molnar et al. and Yin and McCowan, support each other in their findings. The Molnar et al. study provides experimental proof that dogs behaviorally can detect the differences between contexts and between individual dogs. The Yin and McCowan study shows that there are distinct acoustic differences between dog barks for different contexts, and also between dog barks from different individuals.
This gives increasing support to the idea that dogs can incorporate meaningful information into their calls. It also suggests that when one dog is barking, another dog can probably know who that dog is, just the same way that we can identify someone by their voice, even if we only hear them on the telephone.
Recent Comments